The second Firestarters event, hosted by Google and curated by Neil Perkin, was an excellent evening – probably even better than the first evening. There were lots of interesting people to speak to and debate with in the break-out session and afterwards, while the Google catering is unrivalled. I’m amazed the staff aren’t twice the size they are, given the volume of cupcakes around.
The primary reason for the quality of the event is the speakers. Both were very interesting.
Tom Hulme (IDEO)
Tom talked about design thinking as a set of beliefs. He advocated it as a form of divergent thinking. Strong companies that perform well tend to be good at optimising and being efficient in their areas of expertise. Creativity in opening up new avenues can bring in new aspects to a business, which they can subsequently optimise and renew the cycle. Traditionally these would be have been consecutive but with things moving so quickly they should now be concurrent.
Tom’s 8 steps for design thinking are
- Challenge the question
- Be user-centred (and do so in context. Focus groups are not the place to introduce ideas)
- Look to extremes
- Messages or experiences? The answer is both – they are coherent.
- Be holistic – the business model and marketing model are now indistinct from one another
- Value diversity
- Launch to learn – prototyping is now redundant as it is so cheap to launch and run A/B tests
- Stay in beta
Tom is a very charismatic speaker and came up with wonderful examples – from Sneakerpedia being an example of message and experience combining, to Steve Jobs’ calligraphy course as an example of diversity to his open document containing useful tips for start-ups.
He also ended with a great quote: “Looking at why people really hate stuff is wonderful inspiration to come up with new ideas”
John V Willshire (PHD)
John was a counterpoint to Tom, in that he argued the case against process. Channelling Bruce Nussbaum, he said that companies are only comfortable with design theory when it is packaged as a process. And then they are principally purchasing the process, rather than the idea or outputs themselves. Real work, in other words.
Process might make bad things good, but it also makes great things good. It levels things out into mediocrity.
When Adam Smith discussed the division of labour, he noted that the benefits to industry would be in dexterity, time and technology. However, he noted that this process wasn’t applicable to agriculture due to its unpredictability and variety. As John noted with regard to marketing agencies, “The sell is industrial. The work is agricultural”.
Image credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dunechaser/3339729380