As Des’ree once bemoaned, “Life, oh life, oh life, oh life”. A hectic few weeks are *fingers crossed* finally over. Rather than just watching the evening news and eating toast in that time, I also managed to read and bookmark some interesting things posted on the internet. Here is part 1 of a two-part collection of said stuff.
I’ve enjoyed the back and forth discussion regarding the nature and usefulness of insights. Richard Huntingdon used Simon Law’s presentation as a basis to provocatively state that insights do not come from the research department but from a combination of within (presumably not from those within the research department though), real life, academia and “weird shit”. This inspired several other posts.
Rory Sutherland sought to distinguish between an idea – creative – and insight – deduction.
Kevin McLean, a Qual researcher, felt that a little humility could have been used in the argument.
Will Humphrey offered a balanced summary, arguing that research findings should promote creativity and lateral thinking, but that planners should be more “ballsy” when pushing for decent research.
In terms of being ballsy and challenging, Dave Trott offers an inspiring story of changing a slender brief to a truly impactful one after going away to research the product
My own thoughts? Bad research, and bad researchers, exist. As do bad planners, creatives, account managers, product directors and so on. A project is more likely to succeed if each stakeholder is capable of implementing the necessary vision. This requires dialogue on each side – utilising specific skills and expertise to challenge, mould, amend and hone a brief. It is a researcher’s duty to provide a bespoke solution that will provide real, accurate, tangible outputs. If they don’t then they have failed. But other people in the chain have just as big an opportunity to succeed or fail.
Marketing and advertising
Rory Sutherland wonder if we can outsource media planning to the public through recommendation mechanisms within social media.
John Willshire followed up on that post with the notion that this removes control on how the message is propagated. He gives a great example of how such a scheme can easily be commoditised.
Ad Week looks at the rising relevance of shopper marketing in times of media fragmentation.
Faris Yakob uses a brilliant (fan-made) Thundercats trailer to illustrate the power and benefits of recombinant marketing
Iain Tait has a minor rant about the trend of using the themes of connection and collaboration within TV advertising
Graeme Wood remarks on ways in which the internet and social media can be used to deepen involvement in a television show
A NY Times article on ways in which the internet is being used to promote new novels
“Trust Me” – a new shot set at an advertising agency has launched in the US (NY Times). Within the show, real life brands and campaigns are placed. Personally, I think this is a great way to involve brands into entertainment in an organic way. However, in the UK product placement is currently illegal and so I wonder whether the show could ever be shown over here. Precedents are mixed e.g. we may get James Bond films with the “kerching” moments uncut but the Coca Cola drinks within American Idol are pixellated.
Rohit Bhargava on how advertisers can use consumers to help promote them
Ad Rants takes a look at Bob Garfield’s overview of the widget economy. I’m now locked out of the original article, so if anyone has access I would appreciate it if a copy could be sent my way 🙂
Claire Beale on Walker’s campaign to crowdsource a new flavour of crisp
Jim Louderback makes an excellent point in that, online, the third dimension of depth – or engagement – is far more important than reach and frequency
Mark Cuban believes online video is overhyped because the technology isn’t stable enough for mass simultaneous viewing. I would argue that this is what TV is for; online video is not TV and its benefits are different, but complementary.
And to highlight that difference, because the web is much more about discovery and experimentation, we see a huge drop off in viewing between episode 1 and episode 2 of a web series. Newteevee has a great overview of a recent report
A Freakytrigger post shows that the number of new entries in the UK charts has dropped off a cliff in recent years. A negative effect of the long tail?
A very interesting Music Think Tank post on a pull music paradigm shift. There is some dissension in the comments but I found it fascinating
Tomorrow’s update will feature articles on social media, technology and the internet, and business and ideas
Filed under: links | Tagged: advertising, business, faris yakob, Graeme Wood, iain tait, jim louderback, john v willshire, kevin mclean, Mark Cuban, Marketing, online video, product placement, richard huntingdon, Rohit Bhargava, Rory Sutherland, Simon Law, social media, thundercats, transmedia planning, trust me, widgets, will humphrey | 3 Comments »